
Abstract
The Great Green Macaw (Ara ambiguus) is a critically endangered neotropical psittacine, native to Costa Rica, Colombia, Ecuador, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Panama. Two international censuses of the species were conducted in five of the six countries, in 2022 and 2023. Only Nicaragua is missing from this study. The censuses were conducted during the non-breeding season when the species more commonly occurs in flocks and use communal roosts. 653 Great Green Macaw individuals were counted in 2022, while 328 individuals were counted in 2023. There were 30 more participants in the 2023 census than in 2022, however there were 15 additional observation sites in 2022. The results do not confirm a decline in population, as additional studies are needed to determine a true population trend. However, the results do indicate that Costa Rica is the stronghold for the species.
1. Background
The Great Green Macaw (Ara ambiguus) is a neotropical psittacine species native to 6 Latin American countries: Costa Rica, Colombia, Ecuador, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama. The species was listed as Critically Endangered by the Red List of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), after its last review in 2021 (BirdLife International, 2020). Knowing the status of the wild populations is crucial to understand the impact of the conservation strategies currently implemented, as well as in establishing new strategies.
The first estimation of Great Green Macaw individuals in Costa Rica was carried out in the 90’s under the supervision of researcher George Powell. At that time, Powell estimated the population to be approximately 200 individuals (Figure 1). This estimate was based on the observation of flocks that were found in the breeding range and in adjacent areas of the Atlantic lowlands and mountains (Powell et al., 1999). After this effort, it was not until 2009 when the Tropical Science Center (Centro Científico Tropical) carried out another population census during the reproductive period. On this occasion, the estimate was 302 individuals across 16 counting points (Monge et al., 2009).
After this last count in 2009, ten years passed until, in 2019, the Macaw Recovery Network and the Tropical Science Center began conducting annual counts of the Great Green Macaw population in Costa Rica. These counts have provided important reference information to estimate the minimum population size in the country, with the aim of understanding population trends of the species. This knowledge is fundamental in our efforts to increase population size, improve the habitat they occupy, and promote conservation activities for this highly threatened species. Numerous organizations and citizen scientists have been able to contribute to this important activity.
The up-listing of the Great Green Macaw’s status to critically endangered in 2021 created an urgency to implement strategies that could benefit the species across its entire range. Therefore, efforts of Macaw Recovery Network and the Tropical Science Center worked together to organize the first international Great Green Macaw census in 2022. Organizations Ecovida/Lapa Verde and the Horizon Conservation Foundation joined us as promoting institutions for the 2023 census.
2. Counting methodology
1st International Census 2022
The 2022 census took place between September 28 and October 4, 2022, in five countries. For this count, they differentiated two types of counting procedures: depending on whether the count is carried out at a fixed point (roost) or along a transect (road, trail or any place where walking is possible). For each procedure they followed the following instructions:
A. List of equipment needed for the census
B. Counting at fixed points (roost)
C. Count on transects (road, trails or any place where it is possible to walk)
D. General considerations regardless of the type of counting
E. Data form

2nd International Census 2023
The 2023 census took place between September 29 and October 2, 2023 in five countries. Like the year previously, two types of counting procedures were differentiated, depending on whether the count is carried out at a fixed point (roost) or along a transect (road, trail or any place where it is possible to walk). For each type of counting, the following instructions were followed:
A. List of equipment needed for counting
B. Data collection
When collecting data, different factors must be considered, such as:
If for some reason you cannot collect data using the electronic form, you can collect the data using the data collection sheet, however, once the count is completed you must contact the promoters to enter this data into the electronic form. Only data that is issued through the form will be analyzed.
C. Counting at fixed points (exclusively for Costa Rica and organizations from other countries that already have passage or roosting sites identified) (September 30-October 1, 2023)
D. Count on transects (road, trails or any place where it is possible to walk) (exclusively for organizations that do not know passage or roost sites) (September 29-October 2, 2023)
E. General considerations, regardless of the type of counting
F. How to fill in the data in the data registration link?
Before starting the count, fill out the site and observer data in the electronic form, such as:
Report of individuals: if no birds are observed, select “No”. In case of reporting if you find any findings, select “Yes” and complete the questions that appear.
Final hour.
Send form.
3. Results
General Count 2022
At the regional level, between September 28 and October 4, 2022, the first count was carried out. International, in which 5 countries participated (Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Honduras and Panama), only Nicaragua is missing to complete the 6 countries in which the species is distributed worldwide. This count included 49 participants across 20 different organization. 653 Great Green Macaw individuals were counted across 77 sites (Figure 2).
General Count 2023
At the regional level, the 2nd count was carried out between September 29 and October 2, 2023. International, in which 5 countries participated (Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Honduras and Panama), only Nicaragua is missing to complete the 6 countries in which the species is distributed worldwide. 32 organizations and 76 participants participated in this count, accounting for 328 Great Green Macaw individuals in 62 sites (Figure 3).


Colombia 2022
For 2022, 3 organizations participated, with a 4-day sampling effort, accounting for a maximum of 12 individuals in 4 counting sites.
Colombia 2023
By 2023, 5 organizations and 12 participants participated, with a 4-day sampling effort counting a maximum of 16 individuals in 7 counting sites, of which 13 were recorded in 3 protected areas (Figure 4).

Costa Rica 2022
By 2022, 14 organizations and 39 participants participated, with a 7-day sampling effort, counting a maximum of 567 individuals in 25 counting sites (Figure 6).
Costa Rica 2023
By 2023, 18 organizations and 44 participants participated, with a 2-day sampling effort counting a maximum of 266 individuals in 26 counting sites (Figure 5). For Costa Rica, this would be its fifth consecutive year carrying out population counts of the Green Macaw.


Ecuador 2022
2 organizations and 4 participants participated, with a sampling effort of 4 days, accounting for a maximum of 8 individuals in 4 counting sites.
Ecuador 2023
3 organizations and 13 participants participated, with a sampling effort of 4 days, counting a maximum of 10 individuals in 2 counting sites. (Figure 7).

Honduras 2022
Only the Apu Pauni Project participated, with 4 participants, with a sampling effort of 4 days, counting 45 individuals in 2 counting sites.
Honduras 2023
Only the One Earth Conservation organization participated, and they counted a total of 24 individuals (Figure 8).

Panama 2022
1 organization participated, with a sampling effort of 2 days, counting a maximum of 21 individuals at 3 counting sites.
Panama 2023
1 organization and 5 participants participated, with a sampling effort of 4 days, accounting for a maximum of 12 individuals in 2 counting sites (Figure 9).

4. Conclusions and recommendations for future counts
Special thanks to everyone who participated in this important project, including Horizon Conservation, Ara Manzanillo, Caño Palma Biological Station, Centro Cientifico Tropical, ECOVIDA, Las Arrieras Nature Reserve, Las Brisas Reserve, OET, SINAC, and Works for Nature.
5. Bibliography
1. BirdLife International. 2020. Ara ambiguus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T22685553A172908289.https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-3.RLTS.T22685553A17290828. 2024. Accessed on 01 January 2024.
2. Monge, G., Chassot, O., Ramírez, O., Alemán, I., Figueroa, A., Brenes, D. (2012). Season 2009 nesting of Ara ambiguus and Ara macao in Southeastern Nicaragua and Northern Costa Rica. Zeledonia: 16:1 June.
3. Powell, G., Wright, P., Guindon, C., Aleman, U., Palminteri, S. and Bjork, R. (1999). Results and Recommendations for the conservation of the Green Macaw (Ara ambiguus) in Costa Rica.